I’ve disputed your numbers throughout. Furthermore I dispute that they had any bearing on Southern secession. Southerners at the time disputed it too.
You've said you disputed them, but you haven't put forth any good sources which dispute them, and you haven't demonstrated the sources I have put forth to be incorrect. You may have disputed them in your mind, but in objective reality, not so much.
Furthermore I dispute that they had any bearing on Southern secession.
You did that before you even looked at them, so I hardly think restating your pre-biased opinion is proof of anything. Indeed, how can you possibly know i'm wrong before you've even looked at what I had to say?