Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dawggie

I’m going to ask and perhaps there’s not a direct answer..if it was a bomb instead of an earthquake ..would there have been an after shock?


180 posted on 04/06/2018 8:53:42 PM PDT by STARLIT (Trust The Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]


To: NIKK

Well, since I am not a geologist I am not really qualified to say yes or no. But I have lived in CA for 56 years. Aftershocks seem to be the norm, but not an iron cast rule.

Unqualified answer. The earthquake occurred at the edge of an underwater canyon and it may be possible for a large explosion to cause instability in the wall of the canyon resulting in landslides.

Earthquake map: http://scedc.caltech.edu/recent/Maps/120-34.html
Use Google maps satellite view, 33.837N 119.726W


210 posted on 04/06/2018 9:27:16 PM PDT by Dawggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]

To: NIKK

Just to add some clarification here is how much TNT yield it would take to register 5.0 on the Richter scale:

Richter scale equivalent TNT explosions

Richter scale TNT YIELD EQUIV.
1.0 30 lbs
1.5 320 lbs
2.0 1 ton
2.5 4.6 tons
3.0 30 tons
3.5 73 tons
4.0 1000 tons
4.5 5100 tons
5.0 32,000 tons
5.5 80,000 tons
6.0 1 million tons
6.5 5 million tons
7.0 32 million tons
7.5 160 million tons
8.0 1 billion tons

Largest WWII = 5 tons = 2.4
Massive Ordnance Air Blast bomb = 11 tons = 2.7
The Hiroshima atomic bomb = 16,000 tons = 4.7
Largest thermonuclear weapon ever tested = 50 million tons = 7.2


216 posted on 04/06/2018 9:38:20 PM PDT by slag (reelect nobody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson