[saywhatagain]

Conversation getting out of control. Conflating facts with opinions.

Yes, I know what Q said and says. Q is not omnipotent and more importantly we are not really sure of the meaning without explanation, specially written in such a cryptic manner.

So we have group here, and certainly 80% of anons believing that crashes and accident are targeted. In fact Q said it very specifically as such.

Q Post 259

RED RED 9/11.
Funds raised vs distributed?
Oversight?
7/10 plane crashes are targeted kills.
Those in the know never sleep.
Q

Not to confuse and mix apples and oranges, for this conversation stay focused on airplanes or things that defy gravity and stay aloft in the sky. Witnesses on the ground being assassinated is another subject, cars being manupulated another focus. Ships radars being jammed another conversation.

Without me and xone and even you skyPilot, going into technical detail explaining why it is absurd to believe that 7 out of 10 airplane crashes are targeted kills, is there anyone here who questions that statement? I am not talking about agreeing or disagreeing . . . do you even challenge or question that statement?

If by some illusion, one believes 7/10 airplane crashes are targeted, would you think twice getting on a commercial airplane. Now xone and skyPilot, if I as investigator or instructor stood in front of your class and explained that 7/10 airplane crashes were targeted kills, you both have me grounded in a nano second. If commercial pilots even thought of that statement for more than 2 nano-seconds, the whole commericial aviation industry would stop operation 5 minutes ago.

Without getting technical, trying common sense and logic first. How does one explain the sudden rise in accidents? xone articulated that very well already. In my world we call it "statistics" and I am sorry sometimes shit really does happen.

As xone explained, the military due to cutbacks in spending has a huge "training" problem right now. It will be fixed and all will be good.

[bagster]

I appreciate your post, saywhat. What you say is important. I will attempt to pull back on my thinking while still holding onto the possibility that messages are being sent by the enemy.

[CJ Wolf]

Say what again.

[SkyPilot]

The military is hurting from the budget cuts and Sequestration.

I posted that.

Accidents also happen. Flying an F-16 or a military helicopter is inherently dangerous.

I went to accident investigation school in the military, and I have seen my share happen.

And after saying all of that, I believe that the military is being targeted deliberately by the Deep State, because the military is fighting back and is hurting them.

I am beyond the "coincidences" explanation any more.

Was the fire in Trump Tower today just a statistical anomaly?

Andrew Brietbart, boy he was young, wasn't he?

What a terrible "accident" that he died so unexpectedly, and so young?

And so soon after he called out Podesta for his pedophilia and sex trafficking.

And then the coroner who performed the autopsy on Andrew Brietbart dies suddenly from arsenic poisoning. Imagine that. What are the odds?

Military accidents happen. I never said they didn't. During WW II, we lost more aircraft to training accidents than we did in combat.

But I believe the military is under Deep State attack. And these attacks are resulting in cold blooded murders of our service personnel.

[tiki]

I may be misunderstanding your point but couldn’t it mean 7/10 of 10 specific crashes?

[STARLIT]

My question is.

.how old are the F-16s we are flying? I have tried my best to find out how the F-16 fight control works and eveything given is information on what I consider old planes. Do we have any F-16s we are flying, that are newer than 4 or 5 years old?