Replies

And hey presto, in early August our heroes at the FBI dispatch Peter Strzok, noble defender of the Republic, to 'interview' 'George' and someone at the oldest continuously staffed embassy in London.

Australia House. Wonder who it was?

Now Papadopoulos didn't leave the Trump team, until at least mid-late September 2016.

This means the rogue FBI crew KNEW Papadopoulos was on the Trump campaign team the whole time, from at least August 1 to when he left.

I have no doubt that Comey's crooks were spying on Team Trump - and also that they had Papadopoulos, a plant, wired up.

Another thing that causes concern.

Robert Mueller.

If you go to his Statement of Offense in the Papadopoulos indictment, you will find absolutely no reference to 'the Professor' being a UK Intel asset, not to the FBI investigation, not to the meeting with Strzok, not to the meeting with Downer.

Nothing. It's all 'Russia'.

But Mueller MUST have known all this, unless he was totally incompetent. It seems inconceivable to me that George could have hidden it while being questioned by experienced FBI agents. He's just not that smart.

So why no mention at all of these things in the indictment?

It seems strange. But don't throw Mueller under the bus quite yet.

Let's return to Peter Strzok.

Here's a thing many aren't aware of. How long did Mueller keep Strzok on his team?

He was appointed in early/mid July 2017.

He was gone within 6 weeks. Why? Likelier story - Mueller has been working with Horowitz, from the moment his SC started. And knew ALL about Peter Strzok.

Now Papadopoulos didn't leave the Trump team, until at least mid-late September 2016.

If you can't open twitter.