Replies

I found the "tip top" and "tippy top" "confirmations" to be quite interesting—and likely the sort of "evidence" that average people would probably find relatively convincing, as far as establishing Q's bona fide connection to the inner circle of the Trump administration...

I notice that you, sargon, only find the "tippy top" thing "quite interesting" while stating that "average people" would find it "relatively" convincing at establishing Q's bona fides regarding his (their) proximity to Trump.

You're a careful one, to be sure.

Would you consider a statement by a person or persons such as Q MIGHT be as a sort of "evidence" of said murder? Wouldn't such a person be in a position to know? IF, for example you believed Q to be more than an "interesting" phenommenon?

For myself, I consider Q to be past "interesting" and completely verified. Along with his "hints" at AS [187], the strangeness of the circumstances of the case, the investigation, and the subsequent Q hints regarding Hillary, tarmacs, and Loretta Lynch, I am willing to give at least a 188% chance or probability to the possibility of murder in the most foul.

I am a careful man, but much less careful than you. I do understand your unwillingness to take a chance, but these are extraordinary times.

Of course, I cannot convict in a court of law based on this evidence, but the probable cause will get us into court. Then let the evidence fly and the base be brought low by the swift hand of justice. There are people who can supply further evidence, should I and Q be right. The evidence does exist.

Also, I am pleased that you are willing to entertain the "interesting" nature of the Q phenomenon. I hope to see you become even more interested in the days to come, goodman.