Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
You may be right about the "legality" of the location of the crimes themselves. Then again, the data collection origination may be legally considered a "hub" of a criminal conspiracy for RICO purposes.

If I were some type of lawyer, I would be more confident in my assertion but I think the possibility exists that it's taken into account. Along with the other factors that you allude to, including U1.

Lawyers make up stuff as they go along all the time. Just depends on what they can get away with. Eh?

595 posted on 04/03/2018 4:36:21 AM PDT by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 584 | View Replies ]


To: bagster
-- Lawyers make up stuff as they go along all the time. Just depends on what they can get away with. Eh? --

Of course, And venue can be hotly litigated. Courts can also remove cases from one jurisdiction to another, and defendants have the right to ask for removal, on many different rationales, including convenience.

The set of NSA civil cases, some 20 of them, were consolidated and removed to Federal court in San Francisco, for example. Plaintiffs from Maine, to Washington State, to Indiana, and 15 or so other states. Not removed to Utah, where the data was all directed.

609 posted on 04/03/2018 4:55:20 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 595 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson