Replies

Don't understand the tech well enough to make that statement, but surely would or could be first generation of "AI" technology used in data mining.

Use search terms like the following to read about a huge conspiracy surrounding the death of Vince Foster.

ProMIS - Prosecutors Management Information System, Inslaw, Systematics, Vince Foster, Angel of Death.

ProMIS was data-mining before data-mining was a thing. I've mentioned this before, by Dr. J. Orlin Grabbe wrote a series of essays surrounding this story. People waited with held breath for each installment - much like Q today. Only he wrote his messages in the public. He claimed to have inside informtion from former CIA - white hats who tried to expose criminality. His main source was later revealed as a former CIA agent named Charles Hayes - aka The Angel of Death. The claim was that he was largely responsible for many members of the house and senate deciding to, "Spend more time with their family" leading to an unprecedented number of incumbants who decided to not run for reelection in 1994 - leading to the Rs taking over the house majority for the first time in more than 40 years.

Grabbe was a professor at The Wharton School of Business and wrote a major textbook of cryptology and electronic currency/commerce. If he were still alive, I'm sure he would be front and center in the crypto-currency discussion.

I think many parallels between those events of 20+ years and Q today.

Interesting and will read more about Dr. Grabbe. Undoubtedly much the same then as today, but with the proliferation of the internet we see more?

Am thinking we could go back to data mining (on a personal level) to the 1950's. Think IBM and a few others. What I think changed everything . . . was the programs that the new young guns wrote. First as I understand it, they wrote programs that that standardized all platforms from social media to the inter-workings of CIA, NSA etc. So now they can all talk together in real time. The second thing that changed as we learned from Q was the algorithms.

When I get time, will share a theory I heard which answers the above and explains who @[19] [1st] and @[3][1st] are. Those are refernce to specific individuals. @[3]1st may be an unsung hero in all this. @ refers to people at Twitter at the very very beginning. Look up Noah Glass and Ray McClure.

Noah Glass is the guy . . . I think who wrote the algorithms for these platforms. He was fired after things began to roll. He did not take it well. He seems to have dropped off the face of the earth. Will not find much on him. Apparently MI found him. Broke the code.

Just a theory folks . . . just sharing noise I hear.

Am traveling so can not do research now to verify. But what I have verified . . . yeah, there is your rabbit hole