Posted on 03/28/2018 7:15:36 PM PDT by ransomnote
You tell em bagster!
A downside of Q team's efforts.
"Cuck" is racist talk.
"Cuck" is not racist talk. Why would you say that? Cuck is short for cuckhold. A term from olden times long ago that was applied to you when your wife was boning another man. How is that racist? I think, to be perfectly honest, and I've held this belief for some time, that to assume something is racist because it's associated with something bad, is itself racist. That's my comment.
Also, as a friendly tip. I think your account may have been hacked. There has been no activity since 2016 when you advised LS not to say cuck because it was racist. You were silent for two years after that. All of a sudden you do Q research in your spare time and make a comment? I really think you should report yourself as a possible victim of black hat hackery. I'm being completely serious here. Because I'm a helper.
Random thought...is he telegraphing a shakeup/removal?
If so...bad move. Cards close to the vest is a better play.
Sounds like normal internet foul ups to me. Hubby has some crap that is like that. Spent about a week of 16 hr days trying to get it straightened out. Finally gave up.
..and tonight Byron York said that the original emails between Strock and Gumface, declared to be ‘personal’ and thereore, heavily redacted, turned out to be the (now UN-redated) emails that were shown today, in re: the meetings and sharing of info with FBI, CIA, etc -
So the ‘lovers’ cover-up is being slowly dismantled..
Do we believe in coincidences? ;D
Nah, GE. I don’t give enough of a F to put in the effort. I just didn’t mind being able to pick up some new info and since I’ve been BornQ again, thought I’d follow some people and be able to be more involved in research. Just was wondering if I was targeted or something is all. Probably not like you say. ThankQ.
I see a telegraphing of massive tension, but not telegraphing to Rosenstein who must know without reading the letter. Rather, this is telegraphing to the public.
Notice the subject matter here too - FBI handling of a Hillary e-mail matter. Wait, isn't he recused from that? Isn't that in Rosenstein's purview? LOL. Nope. I mentioned this a few days ago. Investigating persons in the FBI is not the same as investigating crooked Hillary, not at all.
Sessions has claimed the "investigate and prosecute Comey" turf.
Your post makes sense if you don’t think many ‘journalists’ are in fact CIA agents. Many people believe that is the case.
Perhaps an assisted suicide?
Has anyone ever seen anything in all those text messages that indicated those 2 were having an affair.
I have long held the belief that was just a cover story for all the text messages.
Cover up will get you caught all too often.
Just random thought.
Bingo! Global Health route!
I’m with Bagster, I don’t believe he’s Q.
I don’t know how you went from citing similar “themes” to saying he’s a Trump insider. I don’t think Trump needs or wants insiders with his background. Only 9 people total know Trump’s master plan and I see no reason why Trump would risk (trust) where he has not risked before (a Facebook insider?), not when he has the NSA assets he has. Also, your guy has goals that oppose Trump’s goals. So no, he’s not Q.
I have seen others thinking that the “affair” was a cover for their texting about bringing down Trump. Apparently they’re both still married to their respective spouses.
I got excited and tole my son to shut up so I could listen. The I'm pending BOOM was loud in that car. I feel like the setups at in place and we are about ready to rock.
BOOM shaka lak?
601
“I have been thinking about one but I am so old.”
We got a Dixie dog, sent up to us on a winnebago..maybe 3 years old - best dog we ever had! Or get a nice 8 year old from the pound..it’ll love you more than life itself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.