Posted on 03/28/2018 7:15:36 PM PDT by ransomnote
On January 21, 2009, Clinton was confirmed in the full Senate by a vote of 94–2.[319] Clinton took the oath of office of Secretary of State, resigning from the Senate later that day.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton
I'm thinking I should too.
and I need another cup of coffee. Thanks
With that thought millions would at least benefit.
bad for liver...
BTW, I think the usage of Gregorian day.month.year format (with dots) is common in the UK and Gregorian month.day.year is the common U.S. usage (I stress, "I think").
That would mean Q intended the date to be communicated as Feb. 12th, 2009 (I think;-).
Sorry, for the repost, I should have looked further down the thread.
Military would make it 2 December 2009! so .... Thoughts?
January 21, 2009 was well before 2 Dec, 2009.
That’s another reason why I think Dr. Gorka is part of the Q team...he probably instinctively uses euro formats for dates, etc.
I’m curious as to how the troll has a screen name of “Basket of Deplorables” with a sign up date in 2014. None of us had heard that term until October 2016.
Good point.
Good point. Very curious. Also went right for the snipe even though she/he had not been subjected to any abuse yet.
The records also highlight a blind spot in the ethics deal the Clintons and the Obama transition team hammered out in 2008 with the involvement of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee: While the pact subjected Bill Clinton’s moneymaking activities to official review, it imposed no vetting on donations to the Clinton Foundation by individuals or private companies in the U.S. or abroad.
Concerns about individuals seeking influence by dropping money in both buckets arose soon after the first few Bill Clinton speech proposals landed at Foggy Bottom. In a 2009 memo greenlighting those talks, a State Department ethics official specifically asked about possible links between President Clinton’s speaking engagements and donations to the Clinton Foundation. However, the released documents show no evidence that the question was addressed.
NIKK-It was known then about Bill’s speech and money to the Foundation...perhaps this.
OR THIS..Senator Collins of Maine questions Secretary of State Hillary Clinton about the Administration’s Afghanistan plan at a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee, December 2, 2009
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eiT1sIda7A
THE LIST GOES ON!
Oh noes...it’s Hillary.
I think the plane crash seems more likely to be the really bad thing Q was talking about
:-) Sorry if I seemed cross, I was just tired and focused on reading stuff and got a little annoyed. No Worries, it’s all good.
I have been over on the Q! I think Q is going to have to be a bit more specific about HRC. I mean my God, that woman has been a very busy evil doer!
*Q cited a Michael Doran piece in NR*
LoL That’s what I was reading when I told everyone to knock off the foodie talk, and yes I did read the whole thing. The guy could have knocked it down to about 1/3 and gotten the point across.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.