[Cboldt]

FWIW, that video has been around for about two months. The March 23, 2018 Youtube is a duplicate.

Brazen Plot To Exonerate Hillary Clinton - 01/20/2018

Priestap was either in on it, or worked around.

The presentation also does not do a good job of distiguishing between Title I and Tiutle VII FISA warrants. The FISC opinion and DiGenova's mention of unmasking are Title I broadband warrant (no individual names) issues. The warrant vs. Carter Page is a Title VII warrant, a named suspected foreign agent.

Having followed FISA civil liability cases, the government has ZERO risk of being found liable for snooping and any illegal unmasking. In act, the FISC ruled that there had been no fourth amendment violations.

[saywhatagain]

I had heard about that regarding FISA cases. Something like only 2%??? overturned. Yeah, government not going to lose one of those cases. Can't bring down that system.

Thinking because its a general background video, distinguishing the difference between FISA title warrents may be confusing. I have tried twice explaining to good folks, mostly called blank looks. Did not know if it was me explaining or the third pitcher of beer the cause. LoL