...Chris Plante,...
_________________
Since there is a plethora of implied existence of those acts, it would technically not be either parody (imitation, w/ or w/o satire)or hyperbole (exaggeration). Sounds dead on to me and a shout-out to the awake.
He risks being called out for harmful/insensitive/demeaning/libelous language. However, he may be trolling for exactly that so he can pull out the closest determined facts and *claim* hyperbole if they scream about it being ‘fake’.
Personally, I’d call it ‘snide inference’. Skates the line closely, but he might be the sort to relish that fight.
Remember, they have been chipping away at (really, redefining) the First Amendment while being blatant in the desire & attempt to repeal the Second.