My take is that this Q-post is less for anons to decode, and more for the people with real-world force capability.
Agree, specially now in retrospect. So Q puts out the signal NEXT WEEK. And what did we see? The media started to pile on with one negative story after another. Did Q flush them out making them start on their firing pattern first, then as some anon are suggest using their code that I don't get says whitehat firing patterns starts next week???
And I agree, some of the code is for mis-direction.
It's just an okay interpretation to me. RED_CASTLE appears earlier, and in that context looks like a white hat asset.
What if GREEN_CASTLE is also a white hat asset?
And that "5:5" string, Feb 21 on greatawakening ...
SEC_TEST_1_ SEC_TEST_2_ SEC_TEST_3_ SEC_TEST_4_ SEC_TEST_5_ [DEVICE_1_X] [SECURE_COMMS_ACT] [SIG_5:5_READ] [ ] Q
vs. March 6 on qresearch ...
Is the stage set for a drop of HRC +++ + +++++(raw vid 5:5)vs March 23 on greatawakening ...
Stage_5:5[y]
"5:5" may be "5 by 5," the phrase used to indicate clear communications, in which case the usage is confirmation (I hear you), and not necessarily confirmation of the same thing across the three posts that use "5:5"
Still mysterious to me, no interpretation satisfies me, and I'm not coming up with anything that ties these pieces together.