Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RipSawyer
If people had continued to have eight or more children per family he might have been proven right.

You're right - more children OR if we had not increased food production per acre to levels beyond anything Malthus could have imagined in his wildest dreams. His math was fine but this future forecast was waaaaay off. Malthus - - right on the math, wrong on the path the future would take... which is almost always the rub.

106 posted on 03/21/2018 9:30:08 PM PDT by GOPJ (How many liberal groups did the FBI investigated versus conservative groups? Agent Lois Lerner?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: GOPJ

“You’re right - more children OR if we had not increased food production per acre to levels beyond anything Malthus could have imagined in his wildest dreams.”

That does not compute. He predicted enough food for nine billion at this time, WELL over current levels, his only error was expecting people to continue having huge families. If not for declining birthrates the world would have been very different.


108 posted on 03/22/2018 3:56:55 AM PDT by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson