ThankQ . . . makes more sense its a person, but rex does not. I see an RT thats not underlined un post 377 that appears to be in context “real time.” Argh. Gonna take Q boy to the woodshed when this is all done.
I take back what I said about the dotted underline.
I had not gone to the source and was seeing Qs posts here.
RT can be found in posts 220, 377, 822, 892, 947, and 959 and all of them are underlined. That dotted underline does not copy.