There have been bits and pieces that have occasionally been hoaxed.
And reputable DNA labs were initially reluctant to be named. Some still are.
However, custody of evidence; techniques of DNA gathering etc. etc. have all advanced and the results are proving to be at least interesting and more than a little conventionally inexplicable.
IIRC, the human component appears to be female from the Levant and about the time when Joshua was exterminating all the offspring of the Nephilium, the giants etc.
L.A. Marzulli's theory is that some of them escaped to Peru etc. etc. etc. and became like gods to the people there.
The timeline seems to fit. The DNA seems to fit. Yet there's tons more to be well researched.
It sounds like a very complicated explanation that hoaxing and deformed skulls can explain a lot more easily.
People have been making lots of money off these complicated explanations for decades. People *want* to believe.
excerpt
The elongated skulls of Paracas in Peru caused a stir in 2014 when a geneticist that carried out preliminary DNA testing reported that they have mitochondrial DNA “with mutations unknown in any human, primate, or animal known so far”. Now a second round of DNA testing has been completed and the results are just as controversial – the skulls tested, which date back as far as 2,000 years, were shown to have European and Middle Eastern Origin. These surprising results change the known history about how the Americas were populated...