Replies

I was thinking N = Nuclear also, but thought maybe it could be for Nuclear War Option. Sum Of All Fears.

ransomnote,

Thanks for all you do on these threads!!!

Pay no attention to the Trolls behind the curtain.

A long anon post, not provided for the criticism, but provided complete because maybe he's on to something with the "We went too deep" statement.

Emphasis below is mine, not in the original post.

Anonymous 03/12/18 (Mon) 10:02:22 25e336 No.638960
I hate to do this but I need to level with Q.
First off, this crumb implying Angela is related to Hitler is not acting in good faith on Q's part. For all I know Merkel is a Polish Jew.. she bears similarities to her sister Irene Kasner and her mother as well. She also speaks Hebrew to an extent.
Saying that Germans named their children after their parents or grandparents is not hard proof of anything regarding Angela. Not everyone has upheld this tradition.
Q's crumbs have effectively put all discussion of WW2 back in the same box it's been stuck in for the past few decades. You want us to expand our thinking while believing everyone back then was a puppet or asset? That means men have no agency and we should believe what he have been told by history teachers.
Since when does Q fear conspiracy labels? This is 8chan for crying out loud.
Here are my two cents. Q dropped a truth bomb a while ago which whipped up the board into a frenzy and divided it into two camps. I guess that is why we are not ready yet. The National Socialists had their part to play in history but stooping to a Hollywood retelling of WW2 will not bring anyone closer to the truth.
Unless Q has more intel to drop on WW2 or Angela Merkel, I'm simply not buying it. I appreciate the work you've done so far but I think the past few crumbs you've posted are no help whatsoever.
Disinformation is real. Disinformation is necessary? I agree, Q.

I've previously offered my opinion that there isn't much value in plumbing history. When the "revised history" (even or maybe esepcially when true) is provided, that becomes the focus, to the detriment of focusing on setting the future on the right track.

Not that I'm against setting history right, just that doing so has a cost.

Anyway, assuming that revising/correcting history does divide the group that is on the right side of the present and future, it's wise to forego the correction - at least for the time being. The victor gets to write history anyway. Save that task for later.

Nephilim World Order ?