To: reformedliberal
I think a telling thing is the description:
The nail in many coffins [liberal undo]. [Impossible to defend]. [Toxic to those connected].
I think that means it's something deeply incriminating in one or a number of ways that undermines liberal precepts, beyond the participants themselves - and that also would exclude practically anything, near everything, blatantly exhibited by and historically excused for the Clintons. Proof of corruption +/- sedition and/or something inherently damaging ala election fraud. Certainly anything involving sex of any kind or manor is probably excused by most Dem's - no matter how gross or evil - but those things will eventually leak, too. HRC shall fret, there are so many possibilities it's impossible to guess ;)
To: Steven W.
HRC shall fret, there are so many possibilities it's impossible to guess ;) Weiner and Huma know.
625 posted on
03/09/2018 8:07:03 PM PST by
bagster
(Even bad men love their mamas.)
To: Steven W.
My guess is that it is Hillary bragging about trafficking children out of Haiti. I think it will show the Democrats contempt for the blacks.
628 posted on
03/09/2018 8:15:30 PM PST by
MNDude
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson