Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: reformedliberal
I think a telling thing is the description:

The nail in many coffins [liberal undo]. [Impossible to defend]. [Toxic to those connected].

I think that means it's something deeply incriminating in one or a number of ways that undermines liberal precepts, beyond the participants themselves - and that also would exclude practically anything, near everything, blatantly exhibited by and historically excused for the Clintons. Proof of corruption +/- sedition and/or something inherently damaging ala election fraud. Certainly anything involving sex of any kind or manor is probably excused by most Dem's - no matter how gross or evil - but those things will eventually leak, too. HRC shall fret, there are so many possibilities it's impossible to guess ;)

622 posted on 03/09/2018 8:02:58 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies ]


To: Steven W.
HRC shall fret, there are so many possibilities it's impossible to guess ;)

Weiner and Huma know.

625 posted on 03/09/2018 8:07:03 PM PST by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies ]

To: Steven W.

My guess is that it is Hillary bragging about trafficking children out of Haiti. I think it will show the Democrats contempt for the blacks.


628 posted on 03/09/2018 8:15:30 PM PST by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson