Just got done reading the post here that say he was talking to Snowden but why then the 905 Q post responding to the guy asking about Twitter receivership (which I also did not get before that from earlier Q post)?
I take it as Q correcting the guy.
Q said;
@Snowden Twitter rec 24D. Q
The anon says;
Twatter in receivership in 24 days? Shut em down!
Q corrects him by saying;
24hrs to respond. He did, smartly. Public view. Q
I don't know HOW that anon got "receivership" out of that. Wishful thinking, most likely. He says 24 days, Q says "he" responded in 24 HOURS.
It's pretty clear to me.
Of course, I could be wrong.