Yes, you are defending his wife’s adultry.
No, the passive/aggresive rhetorical devices you have learned to use do not in any way mitigate that.
No, I am not defending the wife’s adultery. Why did you say that I was?
Is there any limit to what this guy should have been “permitted to do”, since she was committing adultery? Should the husband have been allowed to kill the wife and/or her lover? Do you believe he was justified, and should not be charged with crimes, for breaking into the home and taking videos? How would a law be written, to make exceptions for breaking into others’ homes, based on these circumstances?
LOL, wut?