Indeed. Most applications have no safety ramification whatsoever. Those that do have a safety ramification generally have substantial "safety factor" and often independent means of providing the safety function.
-- Every project that is slated to use that sh|t steel is now suspect. --
... the data falsification scandal, which primarily involved employees saying incorrectly that products met the company's own lofty safety claims. Customers like Toyota and Honda have said they have not found any safety issues related to the company's products.
As I said at the outset, the devil is in the details. What exactly is amiss? The beverage can makers reported no issues.
Two different standards.
The San Francisco Chronicle reports the bridge's anchor rods may be snapping.
Good news for people who like bad news: There are serious problems with the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. Again. From the San Francisco Chronicle comes the news that one of the anchor rods in the bridges eastern span may have snapped:
An ultrasonic test performed late last month indicates that the steel fastener may be as much as 6 inches shorter than the other rods, Caltrans officials say. It could have snapped at the bottom because of corrosion, or it could simply have been cut or made shorter than the other 400-plus rods at the towers base, they say.
The answer could determine whether Caltrans must bolster the towers anchoring system.
In 2012, AAM placed billboards near approaches to the Bay Bridge that decried the use of foreign steel in the bridge's reconstruction.
Its a potentially huge problem, but its hardly the first. The Bay Bridges construction was riddled with concern and controversy, after the states transportation officials and former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger outsourced huge chunks of the spans fabrication to China over the Alliance for American Manufacturings strenuous objections, wed like to note. Quality concerns, cost overruns, and delays marred the project, and the problems have persisted since its overdue completion in 2013.