Cboldt posted above:
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/20144607/Grand_Jury,_Sovereigns_of_the_Court_v_US_Congress_et_al
If you look at the "Opinions" page you'll see:
DECISION AND ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice; and it is further ORDERED, that if Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, it must obtain counsel within thirty days of this Decision and Order; and it is further ORDERED, that if Plaintiff fails to obtain counsel within thirty days, the Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) shall be dismissed with prejudice, without further order of the Court. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on June 14, 2017. (Copy served via regular and certified)(sas)
My take (not a lawyer in real life lol) - there are provisions in law such that an ordinary person can present legal actions in such way so that issues which are ignored by Justice Dept(s) and/or Court(s), the people can do their own - in this case somebody put this "indictment" together and filed such with the Court and it was assigned to "John D. Hoggan, Jr. U.S. Department Of Justice - Albany Office". Seems he basically said, "yeah right" and the Court then "
DISMISSED without prejudice" - meaning that the Court wasn't precluding the filing party from continuing but then admonished, "
it is further ORDERED, that if Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, it must obtain counsel within thirty days of this Decision and Order; and it is further ORDERED, that if Plaintiff fails to obtain counsel within thirty days, the Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) shall be dismissed with prejudice, without further order of the Court."
In other words - "hey buddy, get a lawyer and if your lawyer will bring this case then we'll go through the motions again; otherwise it will be dismissed for good if left to languish". The action was first filed last year as I believe ransomnote remembered - but there is additional action from last week, at which time it appears it was actually filed by the Court - noting that they referred to it as a "
Document titled "Indictment" - meaning it's not a real indictment per se but rather a document TITLED such. The Clerk then noted, "this is a Closed Case, no action to be taken."
Thanks for the follow-ups here - when I saw Diogenesis post I thought WTH too lol - any further info might be obtained from Pacer for $ but I'm not sure it's worth it - if anything were to come of that, previously, now or in the future - I'm sure we'll hear more about it ;)
It's even dangerous for the process server.
3 Attorneys Found Dead In Wasserman Schultz Florida District In 2 Weeks
by Your News Wire · Published June 15, 2017 · Updated June 14, 2017
3 Attorneys Found Dead In Wasserman Schultz Florida District In 2 Weeks by Baxter Dmitry – Your News Wire https://www.facebook.com/DNCfraudlawsuit/videos/811161069046703/
FEARING FOR HIS LIFE AS COLLEAGUES AND ATTORNEYS DROP DEAD AROUND HIM, DNC FRAUD LAWSUIT ATTORNEY SEEKS PROTECTION ORDER FROM COURT, CITING DEAD LAWYERS, SETH RICH’S UNSOLVED MURDER AND SHAWN LUCAS’ UNTIMELY DEATH.
Three high profile attorneys have been found dead in Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s Florida district in the last two weeks, prompting the plaintiff in the massive DNC fraud lawsuit being held in Florida to request protection from the court for the plaintiffs, their witnesses and their families.
And the process server:
Sanders Supporters Stunned by Sudden Death of 38-Year Shawn Lucas Who Served the Lawsuit on the DNC and Wasserman Shultz
Shawn Lucas, Process Server for One Source Process, Who Delivered the Lawsuit Against the Democratic National Committee and Debbie Wasserman Schultz on July 1, 2016
Video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3FMgZruOXE