I think there is great risk in our overplaying that angle, however. Yes, the networks must be stopped and prosecuted where possible, children recovered and saved.
But it is probably the hardest part of the story to sell to those who are not awake and also easily oversold into the idea that that’s what the majority of our general elite are into.
Likewise, “pedophilia” used to describe ephebophilia is a loose exaggeration that erodes credibility.
The use of blackmail in our Congress, etc., is huge, however—and variations on pedophilia are used to get that control. That is an easier to swallow and at least as important part of the overall story IMO.
I don’t think we have overplayed that angle - it’s so unpleasant to even contemplate it’s not mentioned much.
I am not suggesting that it should be used to red-pill someone new to this nor do I know what percentage of our “general” elite are into, but I think it’s a “problem” that our general elite have to be aware of it and actively covering it up (MSM, law enforcment: http://salem-news.com/articles/december292012/boys-town-scandal-tk.php). Would the public watch their favorite newscasters if they understood the role the MSM has played in keeping the pedo rings safe and functioning?
“Likewise, “pedophilia” used to describe ephebophilia is a loose exaggeration that erodes credibility.” I object to both but for those who perceive an erosion problem, there is, sadly, pedophilia in abundance so there’s no risk of exaggeration.
I’ve said for years that our congress was blackmailed. I’m glad we have proof now. But the autists asked Q for more than an 20/80 split on what the public would ever know because, they asserted, how would be be able to prevent this level of corruption if we never knew it existed before. So Q agreed to a 40/60 split. I think there’s value in that - if the informed public won’t believe that pedo was ever the problem in Hollywood, DC, charitable organizations, and elite circles, that it has been and still is, it will return or remain.
The NSA probably has lots more such videos. They could show such videos with enough blacked out to make them lawful with enough left exposed to make clear what is going on.
What do you think the average citizen--liberals--particularly--would do with multiple such vicdeos? They might be hard to dismiss if done right etc.
Then there's the supporting cast of characters in the know who have likely turned "States' evidence."