“But he’s right about this.”
The woman, Stormy, said she did not have sex with Trump. How, exactly, do you know she is not telling the truth?
The lawyer said, correctly, that she came out just before the election and that a false charge can do as much harm as an honest one.
And the baby murderer Hillary can take the moral high ground? The woman who destroyed every woman who came out telling the truth about Bill’s rapes. You mean evangelicals should have voted for her?
Jeffers told Juan none of it was proven... and was denied... he didn’t let that stop him from carrying on with his lies and obama worship
Hmmm. Weird dichotomy. No one said that they should have voted for Hillary. But your logic is that Hillary is a weapon that left can use to make Evangelicals do whatever they want. Because Hillary is bad, then Evangelicals are forced to do whatever else the media tells them? See what abandoning U.S. values gets them? If the U.S. becomes a pagan or Muslim country, they shouldn’t complain. They willingly went along with it.
Somewhere on youtube, there's an audio recording of an Arkansas radio show interview Hildebeest did long before Beelzebubba was known outside AR.
If you can endure her condescending, fake attempt to "sound Southern" without losing your lunch, you'll hear her laughingly gloat about getting a guilty rapist off scot-free. Though she didn't usually do criminal defense work, some lawyer who owed a favor to the rapist figured that a female defense lawyer would have an easier time convincing female jurors, and that lawyer in turn asked HRH HRC to take the case.
So later on this radio show, she bragged of how she used a technicality to get him off. (The police detectives only cut out and saved the part of the women's clothing with the damning evidence on it, so HRC made a stink that without the entire piece of clothing, there could be vital evidence in the rest of the garment that was now thrown away, and she managed to convince the jury or judge of this).
And the most telling part was when she said something like, "He [the rapist] even passed a lie detector test, [laughing] which totally destroyed my faith in lie detector tests [chuckling]". Bottom line: She was laughing about the fact that she freed a rapist who she knew was guilty.
I'll concede the point that this is what the job of a defense attorney is. But for her some years later to chortle about freeing a guilty rapist, when combined with her enabling of her husband's sex crimes, when combined with her solid gold angel's halo of the candidate who will empower oppressed womankind over their male oppressors .... well, it just defies belief.