My problem was not with the CONTENT of the post, but rather then its writing style. There were more snarky comments in the post than there was content. It’s a complicated situation. The snark interrupts the reader’s train of thought and makes it difficult to follow the facts. The information in post may very well be important, but nevertheless, it is unreadable in it’s current form. I even considered rewriting it, but couldn’t take the time.
Yes, the format was rather strange. Perhaps Bongino, Levin, Hemmingway, or York will look into this and print something that is more understandable and coherent, but it is a pretty shocking connection of the dots. I give the author credit for that.