I didn't see it, but I'm not sure it would have an effect on Q drops if we agree that “Q” may be several people.
I'm leaning towards a tactical reason myself.
I wonder if Q-Anon is not one major Administration bloke with some supporters on the periphery of his activities--who contribute bits and might fill-in from time to time.
Or, it could be a team that does everything collaboratively.
Though sometimes, it SEEMS like a single minded sort of thought process/language use.