Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster
"I trust Rogers"

Agreed. That was a big part of realizing what Qanon is/was.
Here is Rogers talking about Snowden:
https://youtu.be/MomMlo0xuSU?t=1194

My take is Rogers clearly disagrees with what Snowden did. He implies that Snowden acted irrationally he doesn't believe he is a black hat. If Qanon says Snowden is a black hat I'm going with what Rogers said.

I've talked with these guys on line in there own forums over 10 years ago. I'm telling you they where desperate and strong believers in the 4th amendment online.

Snowden acting rash? Absolutely. Black hat no freaking way. I don't buy it and that is what changed my mind about Qanon.

310 posted on 02/19/2018 4:04:37 PM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]


To: Steve Van Doorn

Q-Anon never claimed to be perfect.


312 posted on 02/19/2018 4:07:43 PM PST by JockoManning (to cpy/paste if want: http://preview.tinyurl.com/Haiku-For-The-End-Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies ]

To: Steve Van Doorn
I interpret that interview a bit differently, I think. He was noncommittal on the question of Snowden "working for somebody else" but held out the possibility. He was adamant that he broke the law. I didn't see anywhere that he denied he was a "black hat."

Here's the thing. It is quite obvious that Brennan, and thereby the CIA was and is compromised and not working in the interest of this country. He was controlled by the forces that stand against us. Define those forces how you will, but they include Obama, Hillary, Soros, the globalists various others.

Those forces took control of most of our governmental institutions, including CIA, FBI, DOJ, State Department, the White House under Obama, and a large portion of the judiciary and legislative branch. Also the entrenched bureaucracy .

I believe that patriots had to lay low during the Obama years while many were purged, including top military leaders. Perhaps the NSA was not able to be fully purged and controlled and this Snowden theory is accurate. That he was sent by the CIA on a mission to bring them in line or take then down.

Does that make him a "black hat?" Not necessarily. He may have been a dupe. He is very young and susceptible to ideological manipulation. I believe that is why Q seems to be trying to bring him in out of the cold. He may have some use to the "white hats" if he can be turned.

Based on the above, which I believe to be true, I can make no sense of the logic of your stance. With all due respect, goodman. Please try to convince me otherwise.

322 posted on 02/19/2018 4:33:35 PM PST by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies ]

To: Steve Van Doorn

It is your feeling only. Many others think Snowden is playing on the CIA side. I see the CIA as complicit in a lot of real bad stuff in this Country including the JFK assassination.


364 posted on 02/19/2018 6:04:47 PM PST by Metrobank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson