Q Anon: (2/19/18) Continued from Friday's thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

https://qanonmap.github.io ^ | February 19, 2018 | Vanity

[Steve Van Doorn]

"Q-Anon never claimed to be perfect"

maybe. But he sounded like CIA with this post:

Post: 787

Feb 18 2018 17:41:03 Q !UW.yye1fxo 104
@SNOWDEN
WHERE ARE YOU?
NOT RUSSIA.
[EYES ON]
YOU ARE NOW A LIABILITY.
HELPING @JACK?
PROJECT DEEPDREAMv2[A]].
WE WILL NEVER FORGET.
ES FAILED.
WHERE IS ES?
JOHN PERRY BARLOW.
DEFINE THE END?
THE DAY OF RECKONING IS UPON US.
JOHN 3:16
Q

[bagster]

I interpret that interview a bit differently, I think. He was noncommittal on the question of Snowden "working for somebody else" but held out the possibility. He was adamant that he broke the law. I didn't see anywhere that he denied he was a "black hat."

Here's the thing. It is quite obvious that Brennan, and thereby the CIA was and is compromised and not working in the interest of this country. He was controlled by the forces that stand against us. Define those forces how you will, but they include Obama, Hillary, Soros, the globalists various others.

Those forces took control of most of our governmental institutions, including CIA, FBI, DOJ, State Department, the White House under Obama, and a large portion of the judiciary and legislative branch. Also the entrenched bureaucracy .

I believe that patriots had to lay low during the Obama years while many were purged, including top military leaders. Perhaps the NSA was not able to be fully purged and controlled and this Snowden theory is accurate. That he was sent by the CIA on a mission to bring them in line or take then down.

Does that make him a "black hat?" Not necessarily. He may have been a dupe. He is very young and susceptible to ideological manipulation. I believe that is why Q seems to be trying to bring him in out of the cold. He may have some use to the "white hats" if he can be turned.

Based on the above, which I believe to be true, I can make no sense of the logic of your stance. With all due respect, goodman. Please try to convince me otherwise.

[Steve Van Doorn]

"other serious investigations that the DOJ and FBI have been working on for months"

Who is in-charge of those investigations Roseinstien?
They're pissing good money away with no results but you know that already.

You can't have the fox guarding the hen house.

[greeneyes]

If I understood correctly, he was an orphan, and had just been living with this family for several months - they were not his parents. So who knows whether they helping with the mind control or just innocent people trying to help.

[greeneyes]

First they ignore you. Then they ridicule you. Then they fight you. Then you win, or regroup to continue fighting.

[JockoManning]

Sounds like a reasonable conjecture. Not sure therefore, what.

[txhurl]

Not sure we’ll be reading anymore Q.

The exercise was important - young autists learned 25yrs of deep state history in 4mos - but distracting: GOTV is the only way to preserve the gains CINC has made for us. We need to be actively engaging the base, not wallowing in the prospect of vindication against the swamp at this late date, engaging and entertaining as this puzzle has been.

Or the dam could break in two hours with half the deep state imprisoned suddenly.

[JockoManning]

I doubt we've heard the last of Q-Anon by a long shot.

Even if he/they had to change costumes, I suspect the project would continue. Too much seems to be riding on it.

[VA40]

This article was very revealing to me.

https://heavy.com/news/2017/03/eric-schneiderman-new-york-attorney-general-ex-wife-jennifer-cunningham-andrew-cuomo-donald-trump-lawsuit-university-suit-travel-ban/

Especially the Trump tweet:

Wow, l just found out that A.G. Schneiderman met with President Obama in Syracuse on Thursday -— and sued me on Saturday! Same as IRS etc.

[TruthWillWin]

I’m hoping the last sentence in your post comes to be soon.

[SkyPilot]

From the Anon Twitter pages:

"Think Mirror"

Post by Anonymous about what the purpose of Q is (makes sense):

Anonymous‏ @Anon_decoder · 21h21 hours ago  More The crumbs allow Anons to search for evidence admissible in court it creates a path a story without US military having to reveal its own sources You the American ppl are proving evidence w every stone you turn Your work is priceless Don't stop till you seem them hanging

Tina Allen is the Founder and Executive Director of Liddle Kidz Foundation Global. Ms. Allen began her major voluntary efforts in 1998, when she joined Heart Touch International THE LOGO !! 😡 #Qanon #ThesePeopleAreEvil @POTUS

(that is a pedophilia logo)

[greeneyes]

That’s interesting. Good find.

[little jeremiah]

I could not disagree with you more.

[ransomnote]

Q has said that the pedophile rings extend to the elite circles in other countries. I came across this video. It’s the Australian branch of the program “60 Minutes.”

The episode is titled, “Spies, Lords, and Predators” and production is credited to Steven Rice. Only the first 20 minutes of the episode relate to pedophelia among the elites.

https://www.personalgrowthcourses.net/video/pedophile-politicians-ring-uk

It is very sad and shows adults who were abused as children by elites in UK government (House of Lords and other politicians). The pain is in their eyes, in their voices as they talk about the destruction of their souls at the hands of men of power who passed them around as “boy toys.” One man says when he was first brought to London, he was taken to Dolphin Circle (elite area).

The video features an interview with a pedophile who used to lobby for the age of consent to be 4 years of age (1970’s, Pedophile Information Exchange or PIE). He still believes pedophilia is not wrong. He has backed away from advocating (openly) for 4 years old now because “people don’t understand.”

In the interview, the pedo says the age of consent relies upon the developmental age which renders the child capable of speech (i.e., the ability for the child to say whether they like was is happening or not). He still advocates for the age of 10. Later in the video, he objects to the phrase “sex with children” as needlessly emotive and when pressed for a non-emotive term, he says, “erotic contact with children.” The perv asserts that the only harm to children is when later when the child is told by others that they have been abused (e.g., media, public opinion). At around the 19 minute mark, the interviewer works to get the pedo to explain part of his book where the pedo asserts that an adult can “negotiate” for sex with the child (e.g., compliment a little girl’s knickers, says her enthusiastic response reveals willingness). The interviewer presses him to stay on the topic of “consent” of a child until the perv gets angry and ends the interview.

The group he belonged to (PIE) was prosecuted in 1981. One pedophile in the PIE group was not prosecuted. Later it’s revealed that he was then deputy head of the British Secret Service MI6. (Sir Peter Telford Haiman).

The program suggests that this pedophile ring is the greatest scandal in UK history. The adult victims are shown willing to bring it to court to get justice. I don’t know the date of the film. The episode has been repeatedly pulled down on Youtube.

[Steve Van Doorn]

"He was noncommittal on the question of Snowden "working for somebody else" but held out the possibility. He was adamant that he broke the law. I didn't see anywhere that he denied he was a "black hat.""

you're right. You always have to question the worst which is exactly what Rogers is doing in that video. He doubted that he was working as a black hat

said, "He may have been a dupe."

That would've been the only logical thing that could've happened in my opinion. Unlikely they are all highly intelligent people.

Again, I talked with these guys online over a decade ago. They where/are desperate 4th amendment advocates and programs which at that time knew they lost the fight.
There is no freaking way they're intentionally black hats.

Many of them are dead murdered and as of today one more of then went into hiding Suzie Dawson whom was reporting on Wikileaks. Assange he is being forced to face court. Win or lose his case he will be in the open for target practice.

[bagster]

That Scheiderman is an interesting player and definitely an enemy of The Donald. But I see him more as a tool of the enemy rather than a major player. Q says ES failed. What has ES failed at so far? Trump settled the Trump University lawsuit and the Moslem thing is still pending and also isn't really on Q's radar anyway, really.

I think this ES is not the droid we are looking for.

[greeneyes]

March for Racial Justice?

Pfft. More likely the opposite - just sayin’

[little jeremiah]

Thank you!

[zzeeman]

I took the suggestion! ;)