Posted on 02/13/2018 1:40:57 PM PST by Signalman
________
...... thank you.
thanks for clarifying that it is the exact list from Sundance / CTH and that the original blogger PWS provided credit whereas this thread omitted it.
Maybe people put more stock in Sundance and company at CTH because they know how to speak English, not in DaVini Code.
bookmark
Name one source. Multiple people repeating the same speculation is not "multiple sources".
I’ve been traveling and not online for two weeks.
Has there been a single indictment yet?
If he is talking it might be in front of a grand Jury??
rofl, well said!
That's what I was wondering. Certainly this guy wouldn't flip unless he had a deal from a prosecutor. And it appears that the DOJ doesn't have a prosecutor to offer.
“Has there been a single indictment yet?”
Nope. Not even harsh language.
A massive conspiracy of high treason and our AG’s response is that every department has their problems.
I got A's and B's and maybe a C or two.
p.s. Sessions is on it. Read between the lines of the article. You're smart.
“The IG report is purely fact-finding as I understand it”
I believe that is correct. AFAIK once evidence of crime is revealed in that report then the DOJ itself or another special counsel would do the actual prosecution.
IMO the politically explosive nature of what will be revealed is why this seems to be taking a long time. Although it really isn’t, Watergate went for two years or more and we are barely past one year.
This case seems just a bit too big for that office, but if you see the name Robin Ashton suddenly pop up in some of these stories, you'll know that it's being handled in-house.
Well, then WHO at DOJ would give him that deal and in what context? Sessions is recused, Rosenstein is, in much the same position as Priestap and from all appearances compromised, and perhaps even fighting for the other side (we think). There is no named/announced criminal investigation ongoing at DOJ. So who gives him a deal and why does he take it? The DOJ is in some kind of limbo...maybe even warring with itself and the administration. What have they got to give him in all their dysfunction? And who would give it to him?
We have been under the MI6 heel since WWII since they are the ones who created the OSS which changed its name to the CIA. CIA has committed many Nazi like crimes against humanity and in fact brought back many Nazi scientists into the US under Operation Paperclip. We will never break the globalist grip while the CIA exists. The CIA is about empire not the values of the United States.
“The only person I can think of - that we know about - who Priestap could be cooperating with is the IG Horowitz”
or maybe Horowitz’s boss. Horowitz is not investigating “Russian collusion” so the #1 at the DOJ is not recused from overseeing the work of Horowitz and his 250 IG investigators.
Sessions...is an enigma.
I was commenting specifically on the topic of corroboration and evidence. Sundance said there are several sources of “corroboration” and you mocked me for saying we have not seen such corroboration before the public. I can be patient, I am not expecting investigators to reveal anything prematurely, so long as they get there in the end. But some, such as Sundance (and you), like to leap ahead of available evidence. I can “read between lines” quite well, thank you, but all that is still SPECULATION (however tantalizing) until it is really nailed down with corroborating evidence. Which, to date, we have not seen.
And maybe that is the best.
People in the FBI ought to be wondering...
And the people that are guilty ought to be really losing sleep.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.