Syria claims it hit the F-16 with an SA-5, a claim that is almost laughable. The SA-5 “Gammon,” is a long-range SAM designed to engage large, non-maneuvering stand-off platforms like tankers, AWACS, Compass Call and various intel collection aircraft. It has virtually no capability against maneuvering, fighter-sized targets.
A better candidate for the engagement is the SA-17 “Grizzly,” which has been in the Syrian inventory for several years. A medium-range system, the Grizzly is basically an upgraded SA-11. Very effective against a variety of aerial targets, as demonstrated in the Russia-Georgia dust-up about 10 years ago.
The F-16 lost its tail over Syria, suggesting the engagement occurred in hostile airspace. The crew—as you’d expect—headed south to safety. By the time the F-16 entered Israeli airspace, it was probably falling apart and no longer capable of controlled flight. So, the crew punched out.
No indication S-300 was involved in today’s shootdown. Russia has avoided engaging US and Israeli aircraft over Syria, because getting your expensive SAM system blown up is bad for foreign military sales.
“” “” Syria claims it hit the F-16 with an SA-5, a claim that is almost laughable. The SA-5 Gammon, is a long-range SAM designed to engage large, non-maneuvering stand-off platforms like tankers, AWACS, Compass Call and various intel collection aircraft. It has virtually no capability against maneuvering, fighter-sized targets.”” “”
It is more than capable to ‘near miss’ F-16 showering it with shrapnel beyond repair. I believe s200 destroyed F35 in October.
Thanks.
5.56mm