I don't know how long in real time the actual attack and takedown took, but it couldn't have been long enough to fill an entire movie. How else was he supposed to fill out the film? I'm more interested in the good guy's back story than the raggedy man's.
I bet this movie is awesome and patriotic and this person of ambiguous sexual orientation has a problem with that, hence the bad review and those of other Hollywood douchebags.
I will defend the Clint until the day I die.
There is iron in his words of death for all Comanche to see, and so there is iron in his words of life.
I don't know how long in real time the actual attack and takedown took, but it couldn't have been long enough to fill an entire movie. How else was he supposed to fill out the film? I'm more interested in the good guy's back story than the raggedy man's.If the movie is indeed 10 minutes of the train attack and 83 minutes of backstory - irishjuggler
The "boring backstory” of Christians successfully raising up respected, even honored, adults in secular America.”Sully” was a lot like this movie - based on an incident which only took a couple of minutes. A movie on the subject has to address the question, “Where do we get such men?”