I am sure you have to pay to read beyond the first sentence, so no one will read it.
He was an employee of the DoS?
How can the word ‘coverage’ be used in relation to MEDIA conduct?
The MEDIA (so called) got themselves INVOLVED...at that point, it ain’t MEDIA no more!
It’s something else... but NOT coverage
______________
Larry Schweikart @LarrySchweikart · 1h1 hour ago
Larry Schweikart Retweeted Nick Short 🇺🇸
Sooner or later these FISA judges will also have to take a stand and issue contempt citations against the FBI.
_______________
yes
The stink has gotten too bad for even the WSJ.
It wasn't much of a defense and it was found out very quickly. That thing about sunlight being the disinfectant is true.
The difference between this and Watergate is that in the former the revelations served to increase the power of the people in the media; in this one they serve to threaten it. It is more sordid than mere partisanship, and it may well be a similar historical and cultural watershed. If the only means through which a President can communicate unfiltered is alternate media, then the alternate media win. If the only conduit for the revelation of widespread criminal behavior within the Department of State and the Department of Justice is the alternate media, then that cultural power shift in favor of the mainstream media that took place in the 70's is likely to repeat itself away from its former beneficiaries.
The cozy relationship that has developed between the political power structure and its information gatekeepers is crumbling and they don't know what else to do but patch it and deny furiously that it is happening. If it takes the Internet to pull this rotten tooth then that is only likely to speed the process of that relationship's dissolution.
FINALLY!!
It’s about time that the WSJ and other neocon Pubbies got on board.
This will help bring attention to the entire FISA/Mueller/Clintoon/0bama COLLUSION nefariousness, that the FakeNewsMedia (FNM) won’t.
Welcome aboard, WSJ. Better late and all.