Posted on 02/07/2018 5:09:09 PM PST by Swordmaker
Wow, fantasy. You got it all figured out, don't you.
You should start your own threads and make an anti-Q ping list. All you enlightened people can gather there and talk about us ignorant Qbirds.
You can be the leader of a movement. YOU can be the savior of FreeRepublic.
DO IT DO IT DO IT.
They can have this dead thread.
You made a very clear, straightforward point. You said you understood my main point. If that is true, why can’t you encapsulate it? It wouldn’t take long at all.
Please consider validating your claim. It’s the right thing to do.
Not when it just feed something unhealthy.
Going to do some errands and have dinner with a friend. May stop by briefly. If I can find it. LOL. Thanks.
Neither you nor anyone else involved in that discussion had a clue as to what my most central, fundamental and crucial point was. Yet I made it very simply and clearly, again and again.
Let that sink in.
You're being way too dramatic.
You might be more careful. That sharp spiritual discernment might crash your contrarian reputation. LOL.
You just never know what I'll say next, Jockolicious.
:)
P.S. Don't you find it fascinating that old Fantasy wont address me? He won't talk to Grey Whiskers either. He don't mess with the guys that give him a crack.
That's a bully trait, don't you think? He does like to argue with women, though. I'm building a nice psychological profile on him.
I have absolutely no idea what you.......
:)
Be well.
You cannot disagree with a point that you fail to grasp/understand. That is the bottom line of the discussion. No one A, understood the point, or B, was willing to admit to understanding the point. It’s not the first time and is highly unlikely to be the last.
Sometimes, it is best to recognize the futility of engaging.
Agree. In two absolutely futile cases I no longer engage, at all, ever.
In the present case, however, a short, simple statement was made. It should have been very easy for that statement to be backed up and validated. But it wasn’t; the back-up evidence has not been provided and probably never will be.
It’s typically this way with a particular kind of belief system. Statements are routinely made that cannot be substantiated. That’s just the way it is, because the system itself rests predominantly on belief, as opposed to resting on facts, logic and evidence.
Savior from the Deep State. You may not be able to see the difference. You do waste a lot of bandwidth on this thread.
‘Savior from the Deep State.’
That’s not what Q said. That’s only your interpretation.
‘You do waste a lot of bandwidth on this thread.’
The ad hominem on these Q threads is off the charts.
The True Believers are in so deep they don’t know which was is up or out.
Be well.
True!
And am I mistaken, or don’t the Q-believers have a big, ‘troll,’-free thread going somewhere? I thought one of them made a reference to it. What kind of compulsion is it to be never satisfied, but to have to search out and gratuitously insult anyone *anywhere* who is failing to fall into Q lockstep?
Thank you; you be well too.
Oops; I got my threads confused. That middle paragraph was intended for a different discussion.
Correct, and I haven't "turned" on anyone, nor have I called anyone names or insulted their intelligence.
If that's your best try, you may want to sit down and pay attention to what it is I actually SAY.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.