There's a possibility that she struck a deal with them: "let me go without arresting me (for drugs or whatever) and I'll have sex with you both". It would still at least be corruption, and they still should have been fired.
Sure anything is possible, I highly doubt a jury would believe that one. I wouldn’t.
Then they were fools for falling for it and thinking that she would not come back later and charge them with rape.
*IF* their claim is true, then they exercised very poor judgment at least and that alone should disqualify them from serving as LEO'S.
I'd prefer wiser cops out on the street.
If that is the case, then why weren’t her two male companions arrested (one of whom was driving the vehicle the drugs were actually found in, and therefore was the primary “possessor”, and also chargeable with driving under influence)?
To believe that they let the primary criminal go without making a “deal” and then struck a deal with only the girl is preposterous.