That’s just silly. How would a polygraph test have prevented voter fraud?
It’s hard to answer that one. There is literally no way “voter fraud” added over 20,000 votes to the democrats. And nobody is even SUGGESTING that there was a type of voter fraud that threw away republican votes, and we know that republicans had a pretty lousy turnout, especially compared to the democrats.
LIke 480,000 people voted in the republican RUNOFF, and only 650,000 people voted for the republican in the actual race. (1.3 times the turnout)
In contrast, In 2014, the Alabama secretary of state primary had 363,000 votes, and the republican got 733,000 votes in the general election (2 times the turnout)
Clearly, republicans failed to vote for Moore, and some probably voted democrat. A polygraph proving Moore was telling the truth could very well have kept 6,000 republicans from switching to the democrat, and another 12,000 from staying at home — and those small numbers would have given Moore the race.
Did the democrats bus in some votes? Who knows? Did they bus in 20,000 voters? at 60 people per bus, that would be 333 buses. Buses showing up at polling places full of out-of-state people would be something we’d have a picture of, as I’d expect the republicans, especially Moore himself, wouldn’t have neglected to put people as poll watchers.