Whether you are convinced or not, it seems that many of those with credentials, who have actually looked and studied this find over the years, do no dismiss this find out of hand as you have sight unseen.
Some have, most agree with me.
As for “man made round stones” that aspect of the find is considered speculative as well.
If there were clear stone tools at the site, mixed with the bones, it would be an extraordinary find. But there were no unambiguous stone tools.
Some have, most agree with me
As for “man made round stones” that aspect of the find is considered speculative as well.
—
You have, of course, visited the site and studied what was found, thereby rendering your judgment about the age, condition of the bones, and the origin of the stones, correct?