Replies

It really looks like his parents did not meet in Selma in 1965 or Hawaii in 1960 since she was not there:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2278969/posts?page=97#97 and post #95

“Images of Obama Snr from the time, and letters written as testimonials, show no Stanley Ann - there is no mention of her. None. It’s almost as if she didn’t exist. Not in Hawaii.”

Combing through these old threads link to photographs and letters of dozens of Senior’s alumni associates, but there’s no mention or nice inquiries about the status of any girlfriend, wife or newborn baby.

“Was Stanely Ann still on the mainland? Did she in fact spend time in Chicago, where she was accepted to attend the University of Chicago? Was her enrollment in Hawaii nothing but an anticipation by her parents, that never eventuated? The closer one looks, the less likely it becomes that she ever met Obama Snr. Anywhere.”

That’s an excellent observation. We can bank on the fact that he certainly came from Africa, studied at Hawaii and returned to Africa and eventually died. Her whereabouts are much harder to confirm for any time period.

“And what was that all about, her enrollment in extension courses with an address in Seattle? The address shown in the Polk Directory 1961/62 where she supposedly lived with her young son, is recorded as having been strictly segregated. Extension courses can be completed and returned from anywhere. Was that address in the Polk Directory for Anna Obama nothing but a convenient mail-box? She was enrolled as Stanley Ann Dunham. Why use a different name for an address? Unless...she didn’t want to be found.”

Maybe that’s all it ever was, a mailbox while she travelled or studied elsewhere.

It’s a fairy tale: Scanty anecdotal stories crop up which always unravel when you examine the details of time and chronology. The hidden or republished yearbooks with conflicting names or alias’s with unverified transcripts = hogwash or in African terms- Mumbo-Jumbo.

Dissecting the Dreams Tale results in discrediting the humble jumble Hawaiian nativity story.

+Fantasy unravelled Selma, since a baby gets made after a couple meets and marches.
+Fred unravelled Seattle, since a child can’t be babysat until after he’s been born.

This is an issue for the Obots. We assume they don’t believe Obama is dumber than a sack of hammers. None of them has ever admitted Obama has an issue with the truth, however. Well, where does that leave the Selma claim? It is frankly unhinged, mentally, to claim an event that happened in 1965 caused a birth in 1961. That is psychotic level craziness.

But let’s assume our Obots haven’t spent nearly a decade defending a person they see as a bona fide psychotic. Then how DO the Obots explain Obama’s claim? If Trump bragged that an event that occurred 4 years after he was born provided the catalyst that brought his birth about, we can assume leftists would have something to say about it.

Well as it happens, we have just such a case, and it features Obama. So let’s hear what the Obots have to say about it.

Pete? We’re waiting.

Oh, and you other Obots should weigh in also. This frankly insane incident concerns you too. Bear in mind that no other president has made such a bizarrely psychotic claim. It’s just yet another in that seemingly never-ending list of, ‘It only happens with Obama,’ weirdisms.

That was a summary from 2009 when we still believed Stanley Ann Dunham was his mother. The woman who wasn’t meant to be found, was Anna Obama. Charlette Le Fevre found the listing in the directory at the library, while looking for addresses of the deceased rich and famous, for her walking tours, saw the family name of the baby-sitter at 13th Avenue, and tracked Mary the down in Alaska.

Mary, who had been interviewed a short period before about some stolen signs, and never mentioned what it was that would ultimately make her famous, thanks to Charlette.

Sounds like Mary said, ‘I babysat for Anna’ and Charlette printed the story that she had found the address in Seattle of the little baby potus.

Charlette added 18 months, the age of her daughter, to the daughter’s birthdate and said it was in January/February 1962.

Do the math. July 59 plus 18 months is January 1961. Pity the fake birthdate chosen for zero was August 4...and the ‘Seattle Period’ never got a mention in ‘Dreams’.

Are you beginning to see that the ‘adoption’ memo from the INS file, which alludes to a discussion in April, was most likely connected to the child born in January, and the mother was the same Anna listed in the directory?