“the point about infants flying has become immaterial, irrelevant, moot, and of no account.”
Classic tinfoil hat nuttery.
So the narrative that Obama went to Vancouver:
No proof Dunham’s aunt lived in Vancouver or Washington in 1961.
Hawaii did have a Salvation Army Home for unwed mothers.
Three week old infants were able to fly in commercial airliners.
Everything including Abercrombie’s statement points to a birth in Hawaii. But we already knew that.
Time to reread the crucial quote:
‘Officials in Hawaii have tracked down papers indicating that President Obama was indeed born in their state, according to its new governor.
Gov. Neil Abercrombie, who took office in December, told Honolulu’s Star-Advertiser on Tuesday that “our investigation” indicates there is a recording of his birth.
“It actually exists in the archives, written down,” he said.’
If there had been a BC for Obama, it would have been in the vital records. Instead all they found was an indication of Obama’s birth in the archives—it was actually written down.
Game, set and match.
I knew when you got inordinately triggered that the Abercrombie issue was like garlic to a vampire for you. Obots have always reacted to the Abercrombie episode this way. It evokes mindless, reptilian anger among Obama’s most ardent fans.
You should be knowlegeable enough to know that if Obama had, at the time Abercrombie searched, a HI BC, it would have been in vital records. But all their search revealed was an indication of Obama’s birth in the archives. There was “something written down.”
This is the reason Brian Schatz refused to certify Obama as eligible. It led to corrupt Pelosi going so far as to change the actual language re eligibility. For anyone but an Obot, the conclusion is inescapable.