You’re still fixated on the Hawaii narrative (however anomalous it is) even though your hypothesis is that she was in the Vancouver/Seattle area and we’re still waiting for the evidence you’ve gathered to support it.
Either you are not even reading my posts or the information is going over your head. If Obama had been born born in HI, he most likely would have zero anomalies re his nativity tale/documents, etc. The fact that he has more than anyone short of a certified moron could attribute to mere chance means he was born elsewhere. What is the most likely elsewhere? There are two Salvation Army homes for unwed mothers in question. One matches all the known evidence and the other matches none.
I would say, do the math, but with you being a inveterate Obama-apologist there would be no point.
Here is a clue, which will also whiz right over your head. If statistically speaking, HI as Obama’s birthplace is a nonstarter, the next issue must be what is the most probable alternative. If he’d been born anywhere in the US he would simply have claimed that location and, if need be, poduced the commensurate BC.
Since none of this happened, the issue is where *outside* the US is the most likely location. Vancouver is the overwhelming odds on favorite. SA had an Aunt there. She’d have known about it from HS in Mercer Island (i.e.: as a place unwed mothers went to deliver the baby). Her stay there explains the period in her life during which no confirmed sightings took place and her most friendly biographers have only been able to confirm where she wasn’t, as opposed to where she was. It also perfectly explains her sudden reappearance in Seattle. It checks all the boxes.
But as a diehard Obot, you will be incapable of following the facts, evidencr, statistical probability and logic. If it were otherwise, you wouldn’t be an Obot in the first place.