I would believe this if any actual witness (beyond a fabricated BC, which is not an actual ‘witness,’) placed SA in HI at any time subsequent to the ‘60 fall semester and subsequent to the birth. There are ample witnesses to SA’s sudden appearance in Seattle. Why none for ~10 months in HI?
Also, Blake saying it’s true doesn’t make it true. Did the airlines in ‘61 allow <1 mo old babies to fly? I have yet to see a dispositive answer to this question.
“Why none for ~10 months in HI?”
Except of course for the February, 1961 wedding on Maui per the memo by Lyle H. Dahling.
As for anyone else - who knows maybe people were interviewed and the reporters decided it wasn’t interesting enough to include in their stories. Or maybe they weren’t asked about that time period. Or maybe they had died by 2008 when reporters came a knocking Or mayber no one tracked them down.
“Did the airlines in ‘61 allow <1 mo old babies to fly?”
She would have had a note from her doctor.