Replies

So I used Orson Welles ( someone else who is famous for writing, directing, and acting in his movies ) and specifically, “CITIZEN KANE”, disproving that just because an autuer does all of the previous stated things, does NOT translate into it being, in some way, auto-biographical.

I truly hope that the above explanation helps you to now understand it all. As I stated, it is the Aristotelian logic/debate method.

You almost have to be pranking me at this point.

Someone can make a movie and insert a hint into something he likes, or not. The movie can be based on or homage to other movies. The movie can have cameos, clowns, or cowboys. AND STILL IT IS POSSIBLE TO INSERT A LITTLE MOMENT with some little nod to the audience, ABOUT ANYTHING. What is it that you don’t understand? If Allen did such a thing, it is still not proof of anything and I’d be a fool to call it so. You’d be a fool to say it would not be possible for Woody Allen to put in a scene where he winks about his passion for younger women.

You are far from using Aristotle’s debating method. I believe your argument is If A, and B, then C doesn’t exist. Which makes no sense.

So now you say no one who was there (when, when she was being groomed and molested?) says it was true. Ohhhhhkayyyyy, then clearly that is proof she wasn’t abused, right? Geez. Bill Cosby and Harvey did nothing wrong either.

Whoa, are you hitting me below the belt here, saying that I dared to not remember the name of a movie? Oh no, I should be shot at dawn.

I did say I loved the movie. I’ve never said I hate the movie. You are sincerely flawed with the putting words in others’ mouths.

I was making a joke re woody and me as a young girl. But I am assured by you that I was not his type. My loss.

Did you ever study the Aristotelian theory in college? I did and it is exactly what I said it was. You can use it to prove and yes, disprove just about anything at all. I suggest that you look it up and probably not on line, since so much of what's on line winds up being wrong. But give it a shot...either way.

The point is that you don't remember the titles of movies you like, nor the ones you chose to talk about. Heck,it sounds like you don't even remember much of the movie that you are using to claim that Woody has always had a thing for very young girls.

He's been a very public figure for a very long time and doesn't have a history of the things you are claiming he has a penchant for.

And you are the one who is attempting to put words into my mouth, along with your imagining re what these words mean. You really shouldn't try that on me.

Back to doing the scut work, for you, re the first movie, that was posted to me.

After I find and post it to you, you will owe me an apology.