“Hannity publicly switched his opinion of Moore within hours of his interview, which was the most damning proof of Moore’s guilt”
Yeah, the very same Hannity who missed the significance of the ‘DA’ appended to the Moore signature in Deborah Gibson’s yearbook.
Those are the initials of Roy Moore’s secretary Delbra Adams when she would stamp Moore’s signature onto court documents. Like the divorce decree that accuser Debra Gibson received in Moore’s own court in 1999. Which she obviously used as the source when she forged Moore’s signature onto her yearbook. Not to mention the fact that the ink she used doesn’t match.
Allred isn’t about to let that yearbook be examined by anyone other than her collaborators in the press. And while her client Gibson is a liar she’s not fool enough to repeat her story under oath. But it did its job of fooling Hannity.
The signature is 100% meaningless to me, friend. The only significance it has is, if it can be proven to be a forgery, it shows that Gloria and that witness are not credible. But it doesn’t prove anything. If it’s genuine, it doesn’t prove anything. After 40years, there is rarely proof of sexual indecency, and he may never have committed a crime at all.
I am just being honest, and his interview responses, especially the one where he clearly was lying about his MEMORY because that is how MEMORY WORKS, make me know he has something he wants to hide. Maybe he did have a teen fetish when he was unmarried. Also, the sheer number of people that have come forward with knowledge of his predilections pushes me to think there may be an ember under all the smoke. But I don’t know! I wasn’t there.
And as long as he isn’t a threat to victims today, I want him to hold that seat (or someone else with a R, preferably a non swamp R. Which is rare, and he has one). Holding the Senate is one of the few things we can attempt to save our country. His past, however creepy, is not important right now but I’m not playing the Moore is a Saint game.