Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
You don't think having guns threatening your shipping in one of your most important port cities is not a vital interest.

And yet during the whole time that Anderson was in Sumter not a single ship had been threatened. Not a single ship had been fired upon. Ships were entering and leaving Charleston up to the day the South bombarded it into surrender.

Philadelphia Press, January 15, 1861

Northern newspapers did not run the country. In the almost three months following that editorial the guns of Sumter were not used, as the Philadelphia press demanded, to enforce their laws.

119 posted on 11/20/2017 1:09:51 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg
And yet during the whole time that Anderson was in Sumter not a single ship had been threatened. Not a single ship had been fired upon.

The mere presence of a presumably hostile force at the entrance to one of your major ports is itself a deterrent of trade. Nobody wants to be the first to learn that they may be fired upon by a change in policy that occurred while they were crossing the Atlantic.

Have you never heard of the "Sword of Damocles"? Same principle.

Northern newspapers did not run the country.

They influenced the people, and who can say that what is editorial opinion one day is not going to be National policy the next? Certainly the Chicago Newspapers got the war for which they called.

129 posted on 11/20/2017 2:04:38 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson