Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JLAGRAYFOX

In older cultures (Europe, ME, India) and much of the US in the 19 and early 20 centuries men did not marry until they were established with an income and demonstrated ability to support a family. They then sought older teen age girls to marry. A girl 17 in England could expect to marry a man in is mid 30s to early 40s.
My great, great grandfather lost his wife wen e was 55. He had 6 small children and married a girl 16, the age of his oldest child. The new couple went on to have 7 more children. One was my great grandfather.
Young men in their teens and twenties rarely married until the industrial revolution allowed younger men to have a steady, dependable income. Marriage used to be about the ability to support a family.


30 posted on 11/11/2017 10:31:48 AM PST by Louis Foxwell (Progressivism is 2 year olds in a poop fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Louis Foxwell
Young men in their teens and twenties rarely married until the industrial revolution allowed younger men to have a steady, dependable income. Marriage used to be about the ability to support a family.
I read somewhere that that effect was especially pronounced in Ireland, where a man didn’t marry until he inherited his father’s land. Thus, Irishmen in their twenties behaved a lot like teen-aged boys - and hence the nickname, “the fighting Irish."

36 posted on 11/11/2017 10:55:23 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Presses can be 'associated,' or presses can be independent. Demand independent presses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson