Posted on 11/11/2017 9:19:54 AM PST by JLAGRAYFOX
Lookee, Lookee, thirty or forty years ago, the great state of Alabama marriage laws allowed for girls aged thirteen to sixteen could get married with parental approval. Girls of sixteen and older could marry without parent approval. Today the law states that girls sixteen to eighteen can get legally married with parental approval. Girls eighteen and older can marry without parent approval.
Knowing Alabama as well as I do, thousands of girls aged thirteen to sixteen dated with older men heavily, and got married during that time frame thirty and forty years ago!!!
So.....these young ladies accusing Judge Roy Moore could never have been abused, since all these woman accusers were of acceptable age to marry and, chose by their own free will, to date with Judge Moore, on numerous occasions, if that, in fact, actually happened.
If none of the abuse accusations ever occurred..."GAME OVER"...Ladies!!! And.....if they of their own free will, dated the Judge....Multiple times..."GAME OVER" also. Go Judge, Roy Moore!!! End of story!!!
Works for Me.
When Ditch was 30, his wife was 19.
Also, what did Ditch do from 1980 to 1993?
Dating young girls in Alabama was not against the laws of Alabama.
Whether it was decent is a conclusion everyone will draw for themselves.
Elvis Presley first met his wife, Priscilla, when she was 14.
No thanks, I’ve been happily single all my life so why ruin it?
Totally beside the point. If the law governed who gets elected half of all politicians would be in jail.
At first I thought Washington Democrats and Republicans hated Roy Moore for his fearless defense of religious liberty and support of Constitutional principals.
Now the truth has been revealed that the Washington elite jealous that Moore could date women 14 years his junior without having to pay 5000 dollars a night for the privilege
Liberals have been beavering away for multiple generations to destroy all taboos and mainstream all sorts of perversions. Having won the gay and tranny wars, next up seems to be multiple partner “marriage.” After that, it’ll be sex with kids, then sex or marriage with animals.
For now, they are happy to oppose and condemn relationships with kids as long as it meets their immediate needs and convenience to destroy Moore. After this election blows over, they’ll be right back to their efforts to mainstream the next perversions. Count on it.
I read the post article to see what it said as opposed to the hysteria and basically the women said they dated him while they were in their late teens and he was in his early thirties and in retrospect it seems strange but at the time it seemed normal.
That’s it. Those are the “allegations” except for one not-like-the-other story.
Looks like she lied about her age....
Also, what did Ditch do from 1980 to 1993?
You are right on the money. As history will clearly reveal here, dating “super young” girls aged thirteen and over, was accepted in many states of our nation thirty or forty years ago. Marriage and love affairs between young women and older men were accepted as the norm in those days!!!
Shucks...I can remember from young days in the 1950, when the Grandmas would chat under their breath, and say, “My, My, she’s nineteen years old and not married yet,...an “Old Maid” in the making”!!!
Now, the women of today rarely get married before their 30th birthday. Times have changed, and the women bad mouthing Judge, Roy Moore are barking at the MOON!!!
“Dating young girls in Alabama was not against the laws of Alabama.
Whether it was decent is a conclusion everyone will draw for themselves.”
It was even after this that the “Storybook wedding” of Prince Charles and Diana took place.
He was 32, she was 19.
No one said anything about the age gap.
It wasn’t just Alabama. It was London and New York City, too.
After her debut at 16-18, a young woman was on the market for courtship and marriage.
This was before the so-called sexual revolution.
Its a legal trifle. In 1979, good men who were 32 did not date 14 or 16 year olds. I’m old enough to remember what things were like in 1979.
ANYWAY - I’m not accusing Moore. I just think its a flimsy argument. Moore is better suited hammering the themes that there are zero proof or facts in these cases, the clear political timing of the accusations, and the leftist biases of all involved, and the RINO GOP’s immediate and coordinated jump on this issue.
There are no accusations of anything illegal regarding Judge Moore and three age of consent “barely-women.” All WAPO did was wrap up these legal dates to give the main false accusation some sort of validity.
DO NOT fall into the trap of calling these three cases accusations because it makes absolutely no difference whether Moore dated these women or not. One grew up and now works for the campaign of Moore opponent...Makes no difference. Leigh Corfman is the focus. Her story has to be blown apart this weekend. Denials by Moore is fine and dandy, but a Man rarely wins the he said-she said, especialy in this climate.
Where has the media been criticizing muslims who marry and forceably rape 8 YEAR old little girls?
He waited to marry her until several days after her birthday so she would be 20 years old when they got married and she became Diana, Princess of Wales
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.