Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: daniel1212

He dated some age of consent “barely-women” there was no crime, again, there was no crime. There might be a social “ick” factor, but again, there was no crime. Now there is the accusation that would be considered a crime, the taking advantange of a 14 year old. Judge Moore denies that emphatically. Other than that, Moore needs not admit anything was wrong with dating the other women.

In fact he should say that in his youth (stress his youth as he is now 70) That he dated many lovely ladies, some were older and some were young than him. That is all he needs to copt to. Again, there was no crime in dating these women.


59 posted on 11/11/2017 4:24:48 PM PST by abigkahuna (How can you be at two places at once when you are nowhere at all?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: abigkahuna

And the double standard needs to be exposed.


63 posted on 11/11/2017 5:52:25 PM PST by daniel1212 (rust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + folllow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson