“While I dont know if the allegations are true, Im deeply troubled on a number of grounds.”
Idiot. Then he proceeds as if he did know it is true.
Mark Levin has just picked the hoax apart, based on the language of the article.
Hey French, what if someone accuses you of the same thing?
Will you go away quickly and STFU?
I suppose they mean "deeply" as opposed to "shallowly" or "superficially", but that would be a flat denial of the obvious.
When an SJW is "deeply troubled" about some allegation concerning a political target, you may take it that it really means he is jumping for joy but can't exactly say so.