Do I, as a taxpayer, have to pay for the various medical conditions and treatments with which habitual drug-users routinely deal?
Do I have to pay for their lifestyle by supporting them on the public dole?
Bingo!
>
Do I, as a taxpayer, have to pay for the various medical conditions and treatments with which habitual drug-users routinely deal?
Do I have to pay for their lifestyle by supporting them on the public dole?
>
You mean in the Republic of our founding or the Democracy coup we’ve allowed?
Are we not to be beholden per our 4th/5th & 13th Amendments to that which you call ‘welfare’ (legalized theft)?
Why the stigma associated re: ‘illegal’ drugs? Why not the outcry on those POOR poor peoples ‘on the dole’ re: smokes, alcohol and the myriad of other vices we’re supporting? As PP doesn’t pay for abortions, welfare doesn’t pay for the vices *WINK WINK nudge nudge*
“Do I, as a taxpayer, have to pay for the various medical conditions and treatments with which habitual drug-users routinely deal?”
As I wrote:
The habitual user licenses would only be available to those with paid-up recreational drug medical (ER treatment and methadone taper) and burial/cremation expense coverage provided by DEA-licensed entities.