So WHAT IS THE MATH in the JFK assassination?
It turns out there are TWO INDEPENDENT WAYS to determine the time between shots. That is a fact and it is NOT debatable. The confusion starts with the fact that almost ALL JFK "experts", hobbyists, casual observers..... have been convinced that one of the ways to determine the time between shots is NOT valid.
METHOD 1:
The ZAPRUDER FILM was filmed at a speed of 18.3 frames per second (the FBI filmed a clock and then determined the number of frames per second = 18.3).
In the film, there are TWO times that most agree we can see reactions to shots. Immediately after the limo emerges from behind the Stemmon's sign, we see Tex. Gov. John Connally begin a reaction to a shot (frame 224). The most obvious time we can see a reaction to a shot is Zapruder frame 313.
TIME BETWEEN Z313 and Z224 = (313 - 224)/18.3 = 4.8 seconds
SUMMARY FOR THE ZAPRUDER FILM: There is 4.8 seconds between a reaction to a shot by Gov. Connally and the shot to Kennedy's head at Zapruder frame 313.
METHOD 2:
As mentioned earlier, ALMOST EVERYONE believes Method 2 is NOT valid. IT has been viciously attacked as invalid by almost every "academic" that could hold a slide rule in 1963 (upgraded to calculator in the 1970's and today, a computer). It turns out TWO TEAMS of AUDIO EXPERTS were hired by the HSCA to determine IF the sounds of shots were recorded on the only audio recording that MIGHT have captured the sounds of shots. They determined the following shot spacings:
It should be immediately obvious to even the most brain washed American that the time between shots #3 and #4 is 4.8 seconds just like the Zapruder film shows is the time between frames 224 and 313! That alone strongly suggests that the sounds of the shots were recorded by a police microphone on a moving motorcycle.
IF 4.8 seconds is common to BOTH the Zapruder film AND the audio evidence analysis, then WHY HAVE YOU NOT SEEN THIS FACT BEFORE?
It turns out that the HSCA audio experts published that there were FOUR SHOT patterns found on the audio tape but this figure shows FIVE! WHY THE DIFFERENCE? I assure you that it is way beyond the scope of this posting on FREEREPUBLIC to explain WHY the HSCA published four shots when the data actually showed FIVE shots.
To show that there is enough information out in the public domain to solve the JFK assassination, I put together this video. The video shows one more interval and puts together 4.8 seconds, then BANG-BANG, two shots fired almost on top of each other (the dozens of witnesses who said the last TWO shots were BANG-BANG did NOT hear echoes, those were two separate shots and the audio analysis proves the witnesses were right).
When you look at the probabilities that there could have been echo patterns on the audio tape made from the dictabelt police recording that showed 4.8 seconds then BANG-BANG exactly like the Zapruder film shows, then you know with certainty that the sounds of the shots were recorded on the dictabelt! Knowing that you know that a conspiracy killed President Kennedy. Soon after that revelation, you can easily see that the US government possesses forged evidence.
How could all of this happen? The only answer that fits is that the conspiracy was run from high in the US gubermint. And even today, the DEEP STATE will tell any lie, forge or destroy any document to hide the truth. You can know the truth if you want to but first, you must prove that you stayed awake when you took high school level algebra. The odds of the echo patterns on the tape recording of the police recording matching the acoustics from actual test shots AND the time between shots matching the Zapruder film show the odds are well over a million to one that the sounds of the shots were recorded. Unless you have seen what I have written about, you likely have never before seen the AND in this statement!
It's so easy to fool Americans, you only have to fool the presstitutes. The presstitutes have proven repeatedly that they may have taken high school level math but if they stayed awake, they did NOT understand any of it.