fyi
Typo alert in the link above:
www.wattsupwiththat.com
Orbiting Carbon Observatory?
Sheesh, NASA has really bought deep into the Climate Change hoax haven’t they?
************************************EXCERPT*************************
Stevan Reddish says:
“Natural processes on Earth are currently able to absorb about half of human fossil fuel emissions. If those natural processes falter, slowing down the helpful removal of carbon dioxide, greenhouse-gas-induced warming would accelerate and intensify.”
I see only 3 items of fake news in this statement:
1. Natural carbon dioxide absorbing processes might falter. Is the ocean going to stop absorbing CO2? Are sea creatures going to stop forming calcium carbonate? Are plants going to stop photosynthesising? These are preposterous ideas.
2. Removing CO2 (from the atmosphere) is helpful. How is it helpful to remove CO2 from the atmosphere? Do we want to slow down plant growth? This idea is just ignorant.
3. Greenhouse-gas-induced warming would intensify. Increasing from 1 degree warming per century to 2 degrees per century is bad? In what way? A highly presumptive idea.
SR
How can this be asserted (asserted first, btw);
“But on a global basis, all available evidence indicates that human activities are emitting much more carbon dioxide than volcanoes.”
if this;
“the satellite cannot be used as a routine volcano monitoring tool because it does not pass over the same place on the Earth frequently enough.”
...seems the logic is off (or an agenda is ON, imo)