The charging instrument is very specific.
Specific enough that attempt to stretch what was created by State legislature aimed at organized crime as enhancements provisions, without sufficiently firming up the underlying identified conditionals inherent to stated provisions was too far of a reach in what was supposed to be a slam-dunk (they told Paul Looney "...flat out... they were looking for a slam dunk").
Chapter 71 was so "specific" and easy-peasy simple-as-pie-even a caveman could have read out loud a 57-page jury charge (in about on hour or so of repetitive rambling) that had been written-up to help show the jurors how simple everything about this truly was.
Unless we should include Judge Matt Johnson with myself and others around here in signing up for and undergoing psychological counseling sessions held in facilities with one of those "anger management classes held here" banners over the front entrance of a businesses like that, located in a strip-mall development next-door to the 'Traffic School' that serves up pizza and comedy acts (we make you laugh!) as part of the draw, so that we could all of us come to better understanding ---what went wrong?
If not for our own selves, do it for the children and others around ourselves, for "better understanding". At least it seems to me I heard that sort of thing around here a whole bunch of times.
It must be true, it was said so much. <---{as true as my name is joe isuzu kind of true, that last} I'm so honest I tell you when I'm lying
Yep. I was told I was too stupid to reply to because “I don’t know anything about the law”. By a really, really smart guy, so, you know, put me in my place and all. This was just a matter of going through the motions, foregone conclusion, because, you know, biker scum and so damn smart and all.